anyone out there interested in having an arch enemy? and i don’t mean like, a rival. i mean, is there someone basically decent, whom i can torment for fun. and page hits. i think it’s time i transition into an arch enemy/villain type. you guys knew that’s where this was leading, right? i will be accepting submissions immediately. if you’re the kind of person who says stuff like ‘everything happens for a reason’, or ‘i guess it wasn’t meant to be’, that would put you at the top of the stack.

cause not everything happens for a reason. the greater good is some sort of false concept forced down our first world throats when we’re young. so yeah, happy endings don’t sit right with me. and why should they? that ain’t how life works, and we all know it. that’s the draw of noir, as i see it.

though we expect happy endings, and infallible heroes who achieve by sticking to a moral code. but goodness is boring, and evil is sexy as hell. ok, no, but you get my point. it’s more fun to watch at the very least. i think that’s why in other genres, it’s why the antagonists seem more interesting than the protagonists, and also why we’re seeing more ‘anti heroes’ lately. but someone who strives towards a moral goal while being kind of a dick isn’t really the same thing as an anti-hero. the intent is to create a character with inner conflict, but really just comes off as confused. maybe even rudderless. at best, it’s a character who accidentally does some good, while actually being selfish.

i don’t mean we can’t follow a character that unfolds the story, film noir has certainly had some great protagonists over the years. but for as much as the style relied on the high black and white contrast visually, it’s characters and their development enjoyed many shades of grey. and a hero might just be the villian in someone elses story.

KKBB

kiss kiss, bang gnag

anyone see ‘kiss kiss bang bang (2005)’?

i was aware of this movie for years, but never go around to watching it. i think it’s a good example of what i was talking about earlier. yeah, there’s bad guys, but the protagonists aren’t paragons of moral virtue themselves. one of the things i really like about this movie is that it’s indicative of a type of narrative found in pulp fiction, where a normal, possibly dim person, gets involved in a situation much bigger than him. he becomes our narrator, and we see things unfold as he does. as you can imagine, i like this type of plot device.

robert downey jr plays a down on his luck thief, who goes to LA to achieve success in acting. he runs into an old flame, and gets sucked into her drama. he doesn’t try to help her cause he’s a great guy, and that’s established well. if he did, would it seem more relatable to the audience as it would if he was just trying to get into her pants? i feel like i’m outing myself here as a real piece of garbage here…

if you’re still reading, you might be too. busted. val kilmer plays the actual private detective ‘gay perry’. nicknamed so for being a homosexual, which all the other characters seem to note, but doesn’t play heavily in his character. which is an interesting choice, i think, as a bit of throw away character development. not as much for him, but for everyone around him who seem a little hung up on it. i also appreciate the fact that they went there, and didn’t go ‘full stereotype’ with it. i’d elaborate, but, i think i’ve self identified as terrible enough for one post.

so, apply within for an arch enemy. i think i would be a fine villian for someone who gets offended easily. it would be nice if you were local, but, i’m wiling to commute if i need to.