Babysitting the Interweb.
so, i was playing overwatch the other night, cause i still haven’t stomped out the last ember of hope that people might not completely suck, and some guy blurts out the main spoilers for the new star wars movie. just like that. and there’s nothing you can do, you can’t unring the bell. it’s done. luckily, i just came back from my company holiday party, so drinkin’ helps me not exactly recall what was said. it didn’t help my ability to play, but i guess it’s a bit of a wash. too bad we have to count on a numbing shield of whiskey to help us navigate past the shitty people on the internet these days.
i’ve noticed something weird lately. within the same 1 week span of time, i’ve watch 3 different movies on netflix, at random, in the horror genre, that all have the ‘babysitter premise’. they’re all different, sorta, but they all revolve around a babysitter. i wonder sometimes when i see trends like this, if a bunch of different writers all read reports by the same focus groups. maybe they all think their ideas are unique enough to make it to the top of the heap, or more amusingly, that this is some underground subculture, growing large enough to support multiple movies. what’s the new hit trend to take over from vampires, and kid wizards? why, it’s babysitter horror, or course. it’s a rich yet to be tackled field of interest!
i saw valerian: city of a thousand planets recently. i mean, mixed reviews, but undeniably good looking. well, expensive looking. thing is, it kind of resonated with a book about story writing i’ve been reading lately. starts out by talking about how troublesome pitching a movie can be, how new intellectual property can be a gamble, and producers don’t like a gamble, so they stay with sequels, and adaptions of well love novels and comics. so, when someone take a 200 million dollar chance on a french comic, and it bombs, it’ll become the sign at the edge of the quicksand for such endeavors for the foreseeable future.
don’t get me wrong, valerian isn’t ‘scratch your eyes out’ bad. the vfx is pretty, and the plot was ‘meh’, and the main actors had all the chemistry and warmth of gutter slush, but it’s worse sin was not making it’s money back. and that touches upon on of the things that bugs me in film that i’ve mentioned before. just such a wasted opportunity. maybe it’s because people get excited about trailers, and trailers look nice, but are rarely an accurate taste for the story, so why work on it?
I’ve been reading and loving your comic since page 15 or so and never left a comment, but the scetch of the day today is so awesome, I had to say it!
thanks! whatever it takes to get the long time readers out into the light. glad you’re enjoying the comic. the sketch of the day is unrelated, but I thought it would be fun to show you guys what else I’m practicing.
“it’s worse sin was not making it’s money back”
The Intruder, starring William Shatner, was what made Roger Corman stick with movies that he was sure would generate revenue. Its sin? It didn’t make its money back, not until many years later. (It had great reviews, and I think an award, but it wasn’t profitable.)
money isn’t everything, but if you intend to make more than one movie, you better make one that does. sadly, you can’t pay the bills with smiles.
I’ve had that nagging suspicion as well, when suddenly every movie is about the same odd thing. What bothers me more is that I can have an idea for a story that seems fresh, original, and completely new…then while I’m dealing with real life some dickhole goes and gets famous off almost the exact same story that I never spoke to anyone about! This happens so often that I’m convinced the muses want their vision realized and whisper it to a bunch of different people. Then it either gets made one phenomenal time or we end up with a sub-genre. But what the hell do I know?
i think we have the same influences, and ideas may spark, and come to nothing. the one person who follows through, their work will resonate, cause it was based on relatable impulses. dawn of the dead was a good example of this. likening shoppers to zombies wasn’t a master stroke of genius, and in a way, seemed a little obvious, after the fact. but romero followed through. and it was extremely relatable.
that or people are reading our minds. i could go either way.